Are you a supporter of the FBI? Certainly this need
not be an either or question, but in today’s world of litmus tests,
the room for selective approval has become marginal. Most would
concede that there can be a legitimate role for a domestic
investigative agency. But when one accepts this basic principle,
that the central government has a justifiable function to conduct
national law enforcement, the slippery slope of civil liberty
abdication begins. The final culmination, when the avalanche strips
the last remains of constitutional protections, is a police
state.
The majority recedes into the flawed belief that a
reasonable balance can be reached. In theory, with good intentions
and men of good will, this idea may seem sensible. However, when you
compare the record to the promise, upstanding citizens come up
short. In order to be aboveboard, it is wise to admit that there is
an entrenched criminal culture in all societies. Human nature being
what it is, only the utopian attaches pure motives to widespread
conduct. Nevertheless, we are suppose to accept that the federal
cops are immune from their own corruption and rally to their lawless
practices in the name of national security.
Do you remember the horrors of Cointelpro?
"Counterintelligence" was a misnomer for the FBI programs, since the
targets were American political dissidents, not foreign spies. Well,
the lessons of that era, seem to be lost to the generations that
didn’t live through that experience. Many of the adolescent
authoritarians that supported the Johnson and Nixon regimes, back
then; grew up to become the career “just following orders”
fascists serving in the bureau today. Those in change are loyal only
to the State. The rightful purpose of their service escapes them,
that they are supposed to serve the people.
The St Petersburg
Times reports: Attorney General John
Ashcroft announced in May 2002 that he was lifting restrictions on
domestic spying by the FBI - rules that had been put in place in
response to the bureau's excesses during the 1960s and '70s - he
promised the sweeping new powers would be used only "for the purpose
of detecting and preventing terrorism." A classified FBI
intelligence memorandum has recently come to light demonstrating
that the FBI is using this new authority to spy on nonviolent
antiwar demonstrators.
When bona fide conservatives warned that the Patriot
Act was just the beginning, the NeoCons pranced out the scare
scenario as the reason to surrender your natural rights. With the
hijacking of the GOP and the advancement of a psychotic war on
terror, the inland panic has been brought directly to your doorstep.
The significance of the latest erosion of liberty is that the
beneficiary of assembled fear is the originator of the instability.
The linkage that is at the core of international hatred towards the
United States is the underlying policy of supra
dominance.
The verdict has been rendered, the world jury has
spoken and the sheeple that support the deranged policies
of the Bush administration must create an adversary to ease the pain
of self betrayal. Going well beyond the foreign militant, the
easiest and most convenient group to vindicate Gestapo practices are
domestic dissenters. The tradition of America is founded upon
individual liberty. Imagining and manufacturing violate anarchists
is the history of the FBI. The two don’t mix. The question is who is
the master?
Since the experiment in limited government has
failed, the populace requires an excuse for their capitulation. The
psychological turmoil that stirs in the minds of the few reflective
citizens that keep current with this descent into oblivion, must
reconcile how one can resist the insanity of public policy and still
protect our mutual civil rights. As dissent of the few becomes more
intense, the invasive methods of the federal g-men become more
intense.
The price of an unaccountable government is manifest
with each new restriction imposed and with every addition to a
government enemies list. Is this the formula you want for
reasonable, reliable and legitimate national security concerns? As
usual, critics that disagree with this assessment are unable to
refute the evidence that liberty is the ultimate target for attack,
coming from the real enemy of the people - the STATE. With each
passing day, the forces of government consolidation grow as the
resistors of tyranny are isolated and portrayed as disloyal. Get
Real! Have the brain dead so populated the landscape that the trees
block out ALL the light?
The minutia in details on each specific intel
operation is far less important than the fact that such domestic
spying on our own citizens violates the essence of our country. The
best test for a genuine conservative is their attitude and action on
protecting and preserving civil liberties. Endorsing draconian
measures won’t safeguard the public. Supporting the Justice
Department, when there is no lawfulness, will never achieve security
for citizens. Opposing damaging policies doesn’t make one a
renegade. Praetorian goals won’t restore a republic.
SARTRE - December 1,
2003