How do you feel?

If I was to say a child was being raped right now, how would you feel about that?

What if I said I just made that up, then how would you feel?

Nothing has changed apart from a few words on a web page and your feelings.

Such is the power of human emotion and the power of language, particularly the English language, that abuse of the media can literally destroy the world. The above example was used to illustrate the point, that people react to information, when in fact, all that was presented were a few words made up for the purpose.

It was not so long ago with Operation Ore in full swing that investigative journalism by CBC made dramatic exposures in one of the most sensitive areas: 'in the name of the child' to quote Adolf Hitler. For just a short series of radio clips, CBC investigative journalists had travelled the world, to uncover the story from source in contrast to the propaganda that was being fed though the western media, resonating throughout every newspaper in the UK.

Investigative journalism has a long history at CBC, demonstrated by an award winning documentary exposing the media abuse in the first war against Iraq, notable by its absence in the strictly regulated UK press. The American war machine sought public consent for 'Desert Storm' via the media, unleashing emotional manipulation using the tried and tested 'problem, reaction, solution'. The American military's psyops were installed at CNN and a newspaper run by MI6, the Daily Telegraph, ran a story that "babies in the premature unit of one of the hospitals had been removed from their incubators, that these too could be carried off". The first casualty of war is the truth and this story tore through the media like a forest fire.

A fifteen year old woman called Nayirah, who could not be identified for fear of reprisals, appeared tearfully in front of a congressional committee saying that she saw Iraqi soldiers come into the hospital with guns and go into the room where 15 babies were in incubators. She had seen the soldiers take the babies out of the incubators leaving the babies on the cold floor to die. The war machine had their puppet hysteric to manipulate the emotions of the populous destroying all thought and reason.

On November 29, 1990, the UN authorized use of "all means necessary" to eject Iraq from Kuwait. On January 12, 1991, Congress authorized the use of force, out rolled a war and the rest is history, a history largely untold to this day.

Since that time, over a million dead, hundreds of thousands of children mutilated and killed for the dead babies in a Kuwaiti hospital, a grand version of the stage managed events at Waco. Emotions are that powerful, that they can suppress thought though that doesn't excuse why millions of ordinary people carried on with their lives in the face of such atrocity being conducted in their names.

Then it comes to something that was buried at the start, the truth. Once again, CBC journalists were on the case, not from newspapers like the Daily Telegraph, but from source. The public story was dismantled when CBC televisions Fifth Estate released 'selling the war'.

CBC exposed a different story, Nayirah was a member of the Kuwaiti Royal Family, the daughter of Saud Nasir al-Sabah, Kuwait's ambassador to the United States, she wasn't in the hospital so couldn't have seen anything, rather she was given her lines by PR firm Hill & Knowlton which was paid for the story, financed to the tune of 14 million dollars to promote the war. The story itself was attributed to former chief of staff Craig Fuller.

Many other witnesses trained by Hill & Knowlton corroborated Nayirah's story to the UN Security Council but as CBC exposed, the testimony that led to article 7 was simply a hoax, and when Nayirah was questioned by CBC's Fifth Estate, she wasn't even there.

The trail of deception was repeated in the second war against Iraq, this time the hysteric manipulation in the form of Jumana Mikhail Hanna, an Iraqi expatriate, who tearfully presented her accounts to the western media. The mutilated body of Hanna's husband was handed through a steel gate like a piece of butcher's meat after being tortured to death by the Iraqi regime. Jumana Hanna imprisoned, raped and tortured for years on the orders of Uday Hussein was cited by the Bush administration and its supporters as "reason alone" for the war.

Charitable organisations that had offered her money withdrew when they learned that instead of being a brave witness to horror, instead Juman Mikhail Hanna was a remarkably successful liar. Juman's husband,  whose brutally sodomised, tortured and dismembered body was handed cold through the gates of a prison, is actually alive and well.

Problem, reaction, solution. In essence you are being told what to think through appeal to the most primitive of human instincts, rather than the intellect that distinguishes mankind from the animal kingdom, which is incidentally far less savage.

Events unfolding in Northern Ireland detail how the British government, police and the security services undermined the prospects of peace through torture, murder and apportion of blame. Once exposed, a whole battery of secret intelligence units at MI5 were simply disbanded. They had no enduring reason to exist, as Sir Stephen Lander's intelligence agency was acting to perpetuate rather than curtail the war.

It took some very brave people, some of whom were executed, to bring any semblance of truth to the public attention. The disinformation strategy masked the authors of these appalling crimes that were creating the very sectarian divisions that they hid behind just as division is hidden behind diversity on the mainland. Although there is now a prospect of peace, the architects of these crimes have not gone away, an unexplained bank robbery and the instigation of a new organised crime agency are a telling sign of dangers to come from the state.

Many would believe so much of this strife is the product of incompetence rather than the cold blooded and ruthless thinking that went into it. Instability and perpetual war are aims not accidents and George Bush and Tony Blair are two of the most successful national leaders in history.

consider:

rockwell (pdf)
globalresearch (pdf)
youtube

Programming people's minds has involved appealing to base instincts to awaken the beast, also deceptions often involve the opposite, to desensitise, again through the use of language, the English language. One example is 'collateral damage'. A sample reality check is provided as evidence against Bush and Blair, who state that 'every child matters' is government policy.

This child deserves an answer from the UK and US public, he deserves to know why they sponsored the amputation of a perfectly healthy leg.

consider:

whatreallyhappened The Rise of the Fourth Reich
youtube Olbermann makes factual comments on British Police and George Bush
independent US 'victory' against cult leader was 'massacre'

appearances can be deceptive

9/11 World Trade Centre

People saw planes hit two buildings and many then watched three buildings disappear almost completely. Your own perceptions could lead you to believe the collapse of these buildings is proof that two planes were responsible for the ensuing devastation. Cause and outcome connected by presumption.

Question:
What was the reality behind these events and how were they connected?

Truth comes not from answers fed to you but from questions, for as soon as man could talk he could lie. The first and most logical deconstruct would be to examine the evidence. That poses some difficulty, as much of the evidence was concealed,  withheld or destroyed by the United States government, including in violation of the law.

Question:
Why was evidence concealed?

Assault the messenger:
Answers to date have included lies or obstructs like national security or accusations that you are a terrorist sympathiser for asking.

Operation Ore

People saw 'click here child porn', thousands of people were arrested and then some five years later official allegations amounted to the position that some 15% of the people arrested had illegal images in their possession.

"These sites can be horrendous. The Operation Ore sites showed newborn babies being brutalised; toddlers were penetrated, children were forced into the most obscene positions. All this to the most haunting soundtracks, and over the music, you could hear the children's screams. It was blood-curdling."

The squad is now having to put sound-proofing in the rooms where they viewed the material. "This is not about little girls taking a few clothes off and being fumbled, or videos of school nativity plays. People think they're cartoons, but cartoons don't titillate these people, they need real kids and real abuse."  - Bill Hughes now Director General of SOCA

As disturbing as 9/11 was to watch, as disturbing as the words of Bill Hughes to read, what is the truth?  Your own perceptions may lead you to believe, the fact images were found is proof that the story of Bill Hughes was true.

Question:
What was the reality behind these events and how were they connected?

Truth comes not from answers fed to you but from questions. The first and most logical deconstruct would be to examine the evidence. That poses some difficulty, as much of the evidence was concealed,  withheld or destroyed by the British government, including in violation of the law.

Assault the messenger:
Answers to date have included lies or obstructs like child protection or accusations that you are a paedophile sympathiser for asking.

one possible conclusion

A question is always reasonable is it not? It was once heresy to question if the earth was flat, and even today millions of people worship religions transcribed by people who believed just that.

Truth is not derived by consensus,  popular perceptions are so easily contrived or arrived at. A question is a request for the truth, truth is validated by scientific reason and evidence.

9/11 and Operation Ore

9/11 and Operation Ore were not proportionate to the events that ensued, the results the opposites of the claimed causes. This raises questions, which are not answered legitimately by lies, accusations, ridicule or silence. Only the truth honours a question.

Mind the gap

Cognition is how a person thinks, it has many influences, including social, biological, and the media. Human beings are typically unable to see their blind spots, this is the gap that cognition fills, typically with presumption. What you know about the world influences how you see it and what you see influences what you know. The truth so often is sitting there just waiting for a question to find it. Did you ask?

The subject of 09/11 often brings up other defences used to conceal the truth. People who questioned the official stories about 09/11 were labelled under the heading of conspiracy, such is the strength of media programming of the public, that this association can be automatic. A conspiracy theory is a postulation, a conspiracy, if the Newspeak dictionary is ignored, simply means 2 or more people planned a violation of the law. In any event, it would be extreme to suggest that 4 major events occurred in different parts of America in a similar time frame involving only one person, and not a single theory, official or otherwise makes this assertion. It is beyond reasonable doubt therefore to presume that 09/11 was a conspiracy.